Let be a group and a subgroup of . Define a relation on by iff . Is it an equivalence relation? Prove it.
Reflexive: since
(the identity element).
Symmetric: Suppose , so that . Then
(since is a subgroup), and
. So .
Transitive: Suppose and . Then and . By closure,
. So .
Describe the set of equivalence classes.
The equivalence classes are the cosets of . Recall that two cosets and are equal if and only if .
Let denote the set of equivalence classes. Is a group using the binary operation from ? If yes, prove it. If no, provide a counterexample.
Yes and no. The question asks, in particular, if is a well defined binary operation on . The answer is: YES if is a normal subgroup of and not necessarily otherwise. For a counterexample, consider the cosets of your favorite non-normal subgroup of (hint: use
. We will prove in class tomorrow that if is normal, then is a group.